Thursday, June 3, 2021

Absolute absence of any transperency, mechanism of accountability, monitoring and responsibility towards the public/public sentiments - well being, high handedness of the administration coupled with whims, fancies, vested interests and ambitions of the people in power are the anthem of governance almost everywhere. Similar act seems is being resorted to in the case of Ajni Van.

Was SWOT analysis of the various so called or so required models of development including INS done? Was analysis of what will be the consequences on the environment post masaccre of thousands of trees, done beforehand? 

The administration quotes that it will transplant/translocate/plant trees in multiple times of the trees that are proposed to be cut.

That transplantation is a farce and absolutely unsuccessful is a well known fact. We know very well how much deligent and sincere the administration is in planting and monitoring the maintenance of the trees planted. 

Besides, can newly planted trees all of a sudden fill the vacuum caused by cutting of thousands of fully grown trees? 

In a nutshell, the reasonings, arguments and assurances of the administration are nothing but cheap appeasement, false, illogical, impractical and made just to flag off their ambitious project.

No comments:

Post a Comment

'BASICS' : Always the SUPREME yardstick

Unless and until the ' BASICS ' are in the right place, all other things would eventually fall into the category of appeasement. App...